Modern Mrs. Darcy recently highlighted this great tee shirt listing Shakespeare’s heroines.
Beatrice & Rosalind & Cordelia & Viola & Portia & Titania & Desdemona
Yup. The Bard knew how to name ’em.
It got me thinking about what it means to name your child after a personal hero.
Fictional characters are always flawed. That’s why they’re compelling, right? Dig into any real-life figure and they, too, reveal their weaknesses.
I suppose the exception might be saints. After all, hagiography exists to extol the virtues and triumphs of extraordinary women and men.
Except not really. Because most saints – the ones who wrote extensively, or were well-documented in the historical record – also reveal their struggles.
So when we take inspiration from our heroes, we’re necessarily holding up some aspect of that figure while overlooking others.
And that’s okay.
But it’s also a potential risk.
Imagine you name your child after a favorite athlete … only to have the later part of that athlete’s career consumed by a scandal. Or you’ve taken inspiration from a fictional character, but a later re-telling of his story makes him seem less admirable.
I think, on balance, the risk is worth it. Naming our children for our heroes gives their names extra meaning.
But we have to be clear-headed about the possibility that our hero’s name might not resonate across the generations. That argues for heroic choices that have already stood the test of time. Think Serena, not Khaleesi.
Or really, any of Shakespeare’s heroines. Because a few more girls answering to Beatrice and Cordelia and Rosalind? That’s always welcome.
Did your personal heroes inspire your child’s name?
I’ve never lived in the South. My impression is that naming works a little different. This list confirms some of it. But I’d love to hear from Southerners, or anyone who has lived there long enough to comment.
How did I miss the reasons behind the Knives Out character names? I remember thinking they were a little weird, but on point for the story. Turns out there’s inspiration behind them all!
Namerology’s new list of s-ending surname names goes beyond mine. But I still think my pics – like Rhodes, Banks, and Hayes – are among the most promising of the category.
Intriguing predictions for future style stars. I can see some of these catching on.
Lucullan, because sometimes an obscure word seems like a promising name. Lucullan means extremely luxurious. And it looks like a Luc-Cullan mashup, which seems totally unexpected and completely possible. Nobody is actually using Lucullan as a name … but maybe …
As a lifelong, fourth generation midwesterner I don’t find those nicknames particularly southern. Three of those names are used in my immediate family: Bubba elaborated from bub because it’s a British thing from my mil, toots (my mom’s nickname for my sibling and I) and Sissy (my daughter), and we have no southern ties. Also in the southwest suburbs of Chicago I went to school with girls named Mimi (third generation in the same town) and Missy. I will say as a sidenote that it’s quite common for Appalachian English particularly to be closer to British and sometimes Scottish English. We do call my Mom Mimi instead of grandma, but I didn’t count that since it’s common. And for reference I currently live in the Michiana region.
I am a Southerner, though I don’t currently live there at the moment. I can’t speak to all of those nicknames in the Southern Living article, but I know quite a few people who are called those things. (Beau/Bo, Sissy, Missy, Bubba, Bud, Buck, etc.) Though Mimi now tends to be more of a name you call your grandma; and Boy is just what older men call younger-aged males.
Not a child, but having gone through the school renaming process, I would urge everyone to name their schools after trees, not people.
Oh – well said, KM. Our local park was just renamed – I hadn’t thought about it until I read your comment, but this caution applies broadly …