Today’s choice was worn by an obscure eleventh century saint, but would sound right at home on the playground with Isabella and Matilda.
Thanks to Ko for suggesting Casilda as our Baby Name of the Day.
Today’s choice was worn by an obscure eleventh century saint, but would sound right at home on the playground with Isabella and Matilda.
Thanks to Ko for suggesting Casilda as our Baby Name of the Day.
I’m not a loyal viewer of America’s Next Top Model, but I do check in from time to time to see the contestants’ names. Naduah and Ren are already out, but Alasia and Anslee are still in. Speaking of Anslee, there’s a historic home in Baltimore County, Maryland called Villa Anneslie. I find it a slightly more appealing version of Ainsley, Ansleigh and company, though she would probably be confused with rising favorite Anneliese.
I’ve done a good job staying away from Yahoo! Answers baby name boards, but I got sucked into a vortex when I stumbled across MTV’s Remote Control blog question “Do you have your baby names already picked out?” The responses were predictable: Daylin, Tatyana Vanity, Egypt Kinsley Rain, Xa’Kaevyan Kohelre, Brance, Kendrix Olivia, Jurnee Ella Greer. Here’s hoping that each of the posts was written by someone many years away from parenthood.
And one more from reality TV. Tori Spelling turns her literary attentions from tell-alls to kidlit with children’s book called Presenting Tallulah. Is Tallulah the next Stella?
Elsewhere online:
In starbaby news:
But let’s face it, most of my energies this week have gone to the Top 100 lists at Nameberry for boys and girls. Which reminds me – Imogen is on their girls’ list, and a friend recently spotted this rarity on his family tree: Imojune.
That’s all for this week. As always, thanks for reading and tune in tomorrow!
The Social Security Administration should release the 2008 US Top 1000 in a few days. It’s sort of like Christmas-meets-the-Fourth-of-July here at AppMtn.
Plenty of parents turn to the rankings as part of choosing a baby name. You’ll often hear expectant moms and dads mention that they’re avoiding the Top Ten. Or Top 100. The question is, though, are the statistics a meaningful guide for determining a name’s popularity?
In 2007, Jacob was the #1 choice for boys, representing a staggering 23,886 newborns given the name. At the opposite extreme, Trystan came in at #1000, representing just 191 babies. But is Jacob so horribly overused that you’d regret choosing it? Is Trystan so rare that you’d never meet another?
Here are ten things to keep in mind as you consider Jacob, Trystan and every name in between and beyond: