Today’s name falls somewhere between trendy nouveau coinages and undiscovered gems.
Thanks to Racheli for suggesting Rayna as our Baby Name of the Day.
Today’s name falls somewhere between trendy nouveau coinages and undiscovered gems.
Thanks to Racheli for suggesting Rayna as our Baby Name of the Day.
She’s a surname choice boosted by a TV show – but she’d probably have caught on anyway.
Thanks to Urban Angel for suggesting Kelsey as Baby Name of the Day.
How many times have you heard the parent of a small child say something like this: “We didn’t realize Isaiah was getting so popular!”
“I really hope Ruby doesn’t take off! I hated being one of three Jennifers in my class.”
Or even: “I chose Ava for a girl and then my neighbor/co-worker/sister-in-law stole it!”
My theory is this: the more we hear a name, the more likely we are to consider it for our own children. It’s why names like Damien and Regan can pop even after they’re used for children that we hope ours won’t emulate. Ditto name elements – Miley owes some of her success to Billy Ray’s Disney daughter, but more to her similarity to Riley and Kylie.
You and I hear parents’ laments about Ava and Ruby and Isaiah and think: names embraced by celebs/last popular 100 years back/borrowed from the Bible are likely to rise. We’re not surprised. But hey, if you’re here, you’re probably more into names than the average person naming a baby right now.
Which is why I think you’ll be pleased as punch to know that NYU psych professor Todd Gureckis and Indiana U’s psych/brain sciences professor Robert Goldstone have researched this very topic. Their results can be read in the scholarly journalTopics in Cognitive Science.
Read the summary here: Recent ‘momentum’ influences choices of baby names, NYU, Indiana psychology professors find.
I haven’t read the original article – and I’m not sure I have the academic chops to completely digest it – but their finding is this: at least since the 1980s, parents have shown a preference for names that are rising. Therefore, those names rise. And so parents continue to show a preference for the rising names. And so they continue to rise …
It isn’t the whole picture, of course, but it’s an interesting piece.
The late Steve Irwin chose this name for his darling daughter. Now that she’s following in her father’s footsteps will we meet more girls answering to this one?
Thanks to Sassy for suggesting today’s Name of the Day: Bindi.
For those of you in the US, I hope you had a firecracker of a holiday!
The big starbaby news of the week was the reveal of Tobey Maguire’s son’s name: Otis Tobias, little brother to Ruby Sweetheart.
Other celeb news:
Elsewhere in the blogosphere:
Next, a few things on my mind:
That’s all for this week! Tune in next week for Flannery, Dahlia, Gregor, Brisa and Clifford.
Is there such a thing as an authentic Australian heritage choice?
Thanks to Jen for suggesting Kylie as Name of the Day.
After last week’s bumper crop o’ starbabies, it has been a relatively quiet week.
The only big question is this: Did Hank Azaria really name his son Hal? Or have they simply not released his full name? Wikipedia tells me that dad’s full name is, indeed, Hank Albert - so maybe they decided junior should have a nickname name, too.
Here’s the rest of the news:
From the wayback machine – a year ago, the Name of the Day was Madrigal. Really. This week’s names will be Naomi, Lyle, Eugenie, Boaz and Kylie.
I’ll leave you with a quick update on search names – Esme continues to top the list. Lorelei, Isla, Pomeline, Java, Eithne, Aurelia, Ayelet, Noa and Oona are close behind. The list is much shorter for boys: Finn, Elmer and Remus. If you can’t tell from the list, boys generate far fewer searches than girls. And yet, nearly everyone agrees that boys’ names are harder to decide than girls’ names.
I’m off to fill up the wading pool for me the kids. As always, thanks for reading!
The year was 1982. Joan Jett, Survior and the Human League were on the radio. E.T. phoned home on the silver screen, and Rocky fought Mr. T. And in a fictional town called Salem, the character Kayla Brady first appeared on the soap opera Days of Our Lives.
Unlike some soap-sudsy names, Kayla wasn’t created for the show. On the contrary, this obscure variant of Katherine first appeared in the Top 1000 back in 1959.
But the character did lead to an explosion of baby girls named Kayla. In 1981, it was the 581st most popular name for baby girls born in the US. By 1982? It was 133. And in 1983, it broke the Top 100, coming in at 81.
By 1988, it was firmly established in the Top 20, and remained there until 2004, peaking at #11 in 1995.
Today, the Kayla variants are many, ranging from Kaylie/Kaylee/Kaileigh to Kaylynn, Kylinn and Kayci.
But there is a more appealing direction to take your Kayla variant – drop the first “a” and, if you want to really improve on this popular choice, swap out the first letter, too.