It’s a J- name not used by the Duggars … or any other family for that matter.
Thanks to the Kelly for suggesting Jocasta as Baby Name of the Day.
It’s a J- name not used by the Duggars … or any other family for that matter.
Thanks to the Kelly for suggesting Jocasta as Baby Name of the Day.
British parents are mad about him. Will American moms and dads follow suit?
Thanks to Charlotte for suggesting her father’s appellation as our Baby Name of the Day: Harry.
After two plus years in our urban(esque) rowhome, we’re out of excuses for not having paint on our walls. My challenge is to choose based on the actual color rather than my enthusiasm for having walls called Tate Olive. Which really could be a baby name, or possibly a sibset.
But it’s actually a shade of green that might be in our living/dining/kitchen room.
Speaking of design, anyone else think Bravo’s new show 9 by Design likely to up the number of baby girls called Bellamy in 2010 and beyond? Even without the Novgoratz clan’s delightfully named brood, she’s a successor name to popular pick Avery and a tailored way to get to Bella, too. Bellamy has yet to appear in the US Top 1000.
Another reality show name that could pop? Tinsley, as in socialite Tinsley Mortimer, now appearing on The CW’s High Society. I’m not watching HS, but I can imagine Tinsley taking off.
Elsewhere online:
From the Hollywood desk:
April 15 was the deadline to vote in the Baby Name Wizard’s 2009 Baby Name Poll. I completely forgot to vote! The only thing I’d determined was that Esme would be on my “rising” list. Apparently, I wasn’t alone. I can’t wait to see the results. Anticipated due date? Right around Mother’s Day.
Thanks for reading, and have a fabulous week!
She’s a compound name that could sound just right on a 21st century playground.
Thanks to Sarah for suggesting the poetic Belphoebe as Baby Name of the Day.
I doubt we’ll ever have a third child. There are dozens of practical reasons.
And one reason that’s trivial for him, dead serious for me: we could never agree on a name.
We do have a few candidates, scraps from the cutting room floor. I’ve mentioned them in comments from time to time, but I thought a round-up was in order.
Our girls’ list is first; I’ll post the boys’ list later.
If you happened to be channel surfing early Saturday morning (on the East Coast of the US, anyhow), you might’ve caught Miss World 2009, broadcast live from South Africa.
Or was that just me?
I’m not into beauty pageants, but I stopped and watched, eager to hear contestants’ names. Except they kept referring to them as Miss Colombia and Miss Poland. So off to Google I went, and here are the international appellations that graced the stage.
Memorial Day weekend officially kicks off the start of the summertime here in the US, and if you’re expecting a special delivery in the next dozen weeks, perhaps you’re dreaming of a name that celebrates the season.
The choices are plentiful for girls, but we’ve discovered a few options for boys, too. Read on for some names that bring to mind the best of the warm and sunny months.
While we’re of the opinion that there is no such thing as a normal name, we do grudgingly admit that there are safe, sensible choices. These are names that will never prompt a stranger to say, “What an interesting name!” But neither will they cause someone to do a double take and say, “Umm … how do you spell that?”
This list could include such enduring classics as Elizabeth and Mary. But we’ve chosen instead to focus on names that have a more current feel. Many were not in use before the 20th century. Some may not remain viable options by the time your granddaughters arrive. But bestow one upon your child circa 2008 and odds are that it will wear well throughout her lifetime.
So if you’re searching for the elusive normal name, we’ve compiled 25 perfectly sensible, inoffensive, well-known names for your consideration.
Let’s start with an important disclaimer: Bad Baby Names is not a how-to guide. While there are a few gems in this volume, for the most part these eye-poppingly odd monikers are best left to history.
History is precisely where co-authors Michael Sherrod and Matthew Rayback discovered the raw material for their book. The staff at Ancestry.com couldn’t help but notice that, in the not-so-distant past, Fairy was a common choice. (Don’t believe me? Check out the Social Security stats, and you’ll see that it peaked in 1905, when 32 baby girls were named Fairy – as many as Bridget, and more than Diana, Melissa or Annabel.)
Read on for some of my favorites – and some lessons gleaned from this diverting little book.