Girls can be Scarlet and Violet, but boys are a less colorful bunch. Here’s one that might reverse that trend.
Thanks to Leah for suggesting Gray as Baby Name of the Day.
Girls can be Scarlet and Violet, but boys are a less colorful bunch. Here’s one that might reverse that trend.
Thanks to Leah for suggesting Gray as Baby Name of the Day.
After two plus years in our urban(esque) rowhome, we’re out of excuses for not having paint on our walls. My challenge is to choose based on the actual color rather than my enthusiasm for having walls called Tate Olive. Which really could be a baby name, or possibly a sibset.
But it’s actually a shade of green that might be in our living/dining/kitchen room.
Speaking of design, anyone else think Bravo’s new show 9 by Design likely to up the number of baby girls called Bellamy in 2010 and beyond? Even without the Novgoratz clan’s delightfully named brood, she’s a successor name to popular pick Avery and a tailored way to get to Bella, too. Bellamy has yet to appear in the US Top 1000.
Another reality show name that could pop? Tinsley, as in socialite Tinsley Mortimer, now appearing on The CW’s High Society. I’m not watching HS, but I can imagine Tinsley taking off.
Elsewhere online:
From the Hollywood desk:
April 15 was the deadline to vote in the Baby Name Wizard’s 2009 Baby Name Poll. I completely forgot to vote! The only thing I’d determined was that Esme would be on my “rising” list. Apparently, I wasn’t alone. I can’t wait to see the results. Anticipated due date? Right around Mother’s Day.
Thanks for reading, and have a fabulous week!
Let’s start off our Sunday with some controversy. The NameLady recently answered a reader’s question: Are there rules for nicknames?
Her answer was basically yes. Julia can be Julie and David Dave, but take it much farther you really should just put the nickname on the birth certificate. (In this case, she advised her reader to put Catie on the birth certificate.)
I disagree. And I said so.
Much to my delight, other readers come out strongly in favor of nicknames, too.
In other, (mostly) non-ranting news:
In celeb-spotting, all via Celebrity Baby Blog:
Lastly, I keep meaning to share this snippet of conversation I had with two colleagues, after one had went to visit a friend’s new baby:
V: What did they name him? E: Bryce. V: Now that’s a buppy name! E: Bryce Roosevelt. V: Roosevelt? That’s old school buppy!You might note that I am uncharacteristically speechless throughout this exchange.
Buppy = Black Urban Professional, and up until that moment, I was completely unaware that such a category of monikers existed. (Though if I had thought about it for a second, I guess I’d have imagined it would.) When I pressed my colleague for a list of buppy names, she shrugged. Clearly this was not as interesting to her, though she did concede that Morgan is the default buppy choice for a daughter.
So I’m dying to know more about buppy names, but I don’t think I can ask E. anymore without risking her ire. (And she orders the cookies for meetings, so I don’t dare.) If anyone stumbles across a list, please share.
That’s all for this week. As always, thank you for reading!
As part of our Birthday Fun Weekend, we took the kids off to Build-A-Bear Workshop. Actually, Aly built a bear dog. There was stuffing and fluffing and convincing us that yes, his bear dog absolutely needed ice skates. And then we got to the moment – naming the bear dog.
After several suggestions were rejected by the Builder of the Beast, including Harry and Warren, we settled on Star. Unimaginative, I guess. But we’d been there for a while. And a birthday party was bearing down on the birth certificate station.
“Maybe,” my friend suggested, “he should be Starr. Star doesn’t seem like much of a name.”
“Starr? Really?”
“I guess it is kind of feminine. Maybe an e at the end?”
“Stare? How ’bout Stahr?” I replied.
And just like that, I understood precisely how we end up naming our kids Jordyn and Madalon and Carsin. Except that a plush pet doesn’t ever have to put his name on a business card.
In other news, Nymbler released their September search names:
It’s been a quiet week in celebribaby naming news, and the choices have been quite conservative, including:
As for real life kids:
My vote for best diversion of the week goes here: this Nameberry post on Hawaiian Baby Names led to a link to find your Hawaiian name. I spent much, too much time converting the names of everyone I know into Hawaiian. In RL, of course, I am far too pasty to be answer to Apikalia.
Speaking of RL, I’ll confess that I’m dealing with a Level of Hectic that I haven’t encountered, well – ever. I’m often slow to respond to Name of the Day requests – I like to save them up, then sit down with my calendar and look at bunches at once. But these days? It might be slower than slow. Please stand by, and know that I do look at every request and do my best to squeeze ‘em in.
Thanks for reading – have a great week!
The Social Security Administration should release the 2008 US Top 1000 in a few days. It’s sort of like Christmas-meets-the-Fourth-of-July here at AppMtn.
Plenty of parents turn to the rankings as part of choosing a baby name. You’ll often hear expectant moms and dads mention that they’re avoiding the Top Ten. Or Top 100. The question is, though, are the statistics a meaningful guide for determining a name’s popularity?
In 2007, Jacob was the #1 choice for boys, representing a staggering 23,886 newborns given the name. At the opposite extreme, Trystan came in at #1000, representing just 191 babies. But is Jacob so horribly overused that you’d regret choosing it? Is Trystan so rare that you’d never meet another?
Here are ten things to keep in mind as you consider Jacob, Trystan and every name in between and beyond: