As I looked at the stats from last week’s Yea or Nay: Loretta post, I wondered – how have the featured names performed? Did any receive a resounding yea? Do the comments match up with the votes?
Here’s a quick look back, boys first:
- The first name profiled – Kohl, spotted on Wife Swap – received a clear thumbs down, with 74% voting Nay. It wasn’t the name as much as the spelling. Several readers commented that they liked Cole just fine;
- Huxley fared slightly better, at 46% Nay, 30% Yay, with the lovely Photoquilty voting Yea, only for a pet. I don’t normally vote, but if I did, I’d be giving Huxley two thumbs up;
- Boys’ name Koah fared worst of all, with 82% Nay. I spotted this one in a magazine – the family appeared to all share the first initial K.
Moving on to the girls:
- Starbaby Sosie was 50% Nay, 34% Yea. But among those Yeas were a few enthusiastic supporters – one reader plans to name a future daughter Sosie Fiona Pearl. Others thought Sosie would make a great nickname for Susanna, but didn’t quite stand on her own;
- With 63% Yea, Lilac is one of the few names to pass muster, with many citing an affection for flower names in general;
- I assumed Annalena would fare better, but at 37% Yea and 38% Nay, not so much. Most seemed to prefer another Anna combo – or just Anna on her own;
- Which brings us back to Loretta – at 36% Yea and 39% Nay, she’s not fared much better than Annalena – but who knows? SJP is a trend-setter. As we get used to it, this one might start to feel more familiar – and heard more often!
Filed under: Names for Boys, Names for Girls, Yea or Nay | 1 Comment
Tags: Anna, Annalena, Cole, Fiona, Huxley, Kohl, Lilac, Loretta, Pearl, Sosie
Very interesting. While the girls’ names fared just as poorly as the boys’, the names somehow seem less outlandish — I guess that an indication of our society’s greater willingness to take risks when it comes to girls’ names.
I recently met a woman named Andelina; I confess that I rather like the name.