<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alphabet: A is for Girls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/31/alphabet-a-is-for-girls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/31/alphabet-a-is-for-girls/</link>
	<description>Where Every Name Has a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:49:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanAngel</title>
		<link>http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/31/alphabet-a-is-for-girls/#comment-10089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UrbanAngel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationmountain.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-10089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This might be odd, but I can still handle Apple (why people complain when you compare it ot the legitimate Egbert (which is just plain stinky to me while Apple is at least fresh) - it&#039;s the Moses that throws me

I like Anya (still iffy on how to say it) &amp; Alyssa. I&#039;ve never really been a fan of ALice - it just seems incomplete to me compared to Alison or Alyssa. I can&#039;t stand Ava &amp; Avalon is way too similar . I dislike Adelaide as it doesn&#039;t seem delicate &amp; Addie reminds me of algebra - which I hate.I much prefer Audrey to Audrey. I&#039;ve never really been drawn to Audrey at all . Aubrey was originally masculine, but, the -brey part is much to similar to many of other b girls names for it to even remotely be feminine to me. Examples are Brielle, Briony,Britney, etc the name Aubrey is much softer &amp; impossible masculine to me]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This might be odd, but I can still handle Apple (why people complain when you compare it ot the legitimate Egbert (which is just plain stinky to me while Apple is at least fresh) &#8211; it&#8217;s the Moses that throws me</p>
<p>I like Anya (still iffy on how to say it) &amp; Alyssa. I&#8217;ve never really been a fan of ALice &#8211; it just seems incomplete to me compared to Alison or Alyssa. I can&#8217;t stand Ava &amp; Avalon is way too similar . I dislike Adelaide as it doesn&#8217;t seem delicate &amp; Addie reminds me of algebra &#8211; which I hate.I much prefer Audrey to Audrey. I&#8217;ve never really been drawn to Audrey at all . Aubrey was originally masculine, but, the -brey part is much to similar to many of other b girls names for it to even remotely be feminine to me. Examples are Brielle, Briony,Britney, etc the name Aubrey is much softer &amp; impossible masculine to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alphabet: B is for Girls &#171; Appellation Mountain</title>
		<link>http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/31/alphabet-a-is-for-girls/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alphabet: B is for Girls &#171; Appellation Mountain]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationmountain.wordpress.com/?p=25#comment-25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] B is for&#160;Girls 10Feb08    Last month, we at ApMtn started our Alphabet Extravaganza with A is for Girls, a review of a few neglected names beginning with A.  Today we move right on down the line to [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] B is for&nbsp;Girls 10Feb08    Last month, we at ApMtn started our Alphabet Extravaganza with A is for Girls, a review of a few neglected names beginning with A.  Today we move right on down the line to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

