<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Railway Names</title>
	<atom:link href="http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/25/railway-names/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/25/railway-names/</link>
	<description>Where Every Name Has a Story</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 20:57:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: UrbanAngel</title>
		<link>http://appellationmountain.net/2008/01/25/railway-names/#comment-10190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[UrbanAngel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 18:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://appellationmountain.wordpress.com/2008/01/25/railway-names/#comment-10190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is really interesting :) On the male list, the only one I like &amp; would use (I used to love it &amp; then grew out of it - it&#039;s now SOLELY a middle name option ) is James.Such a handsome name. Edward I can now tolerate, though Ed I don&#039;t like. Pieter is WAY too popular too much of a &#039;60s name where I live &amp; Peter is just there for me. A bit dull, to be honest. I would have possible gone for Duncan, except for the &#039;dunkin part &amp; there&#039;s a Duncan on a soapie here, so I don&#039;t want that

I&#039;m not really a fan of Anne/Anna/Annie etc &amp; would never use them. They&#039;re not bad &amp; there&#039;s nothing wrong with them - just not me. Henrietta does not appeal to me at all. The name, the style &amp; the idea of a Henrietta to me is so opposite to me as a person &amp; the type of vibe that a child of mine would be raised in. Clarabel I don&#039;t mind &amp; is sweet, though Clarabelle is better to me (dislike it when the names are spelled Annabel etc, it doesn&#039;t look &#039;complete&#039;). I just don&#039;t like Clara enough to ever consider it. Daisy I do like, though it had to grow on me. I wouldn&#039;t use it, though I think it&#039;s cute.Very British :)

Very interesting post]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is really interesting <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  On the male list, the only one I like &amp; would use (I used to love it &amp; then grew out of it &#8211; it&#8217;s now SOLELY a middle name option ) is James.Such a handsome name. Edward I can now tolerate, though Ed I don&#8217;t like. Pieter is WAY too popular too much of a &#8217;60s name where I live &amp; Peter is just there for me. A bit dull, to be honest. I would have possible gone for Duncan, except for the &#8216;dunkin part &amp; there&#8217;s a Duncan on a soapie here, so I don&#8217;t want that</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really a fan of Anne/Anna/Annie etc &amp; would never use them. They&#8217;re not bad &amp; there&#8217;s nothing wrong with them &#8211; just not me. Henrietta does not appeal to me at all. The name, the style &amp; the idea of a Henrietta to me is so opposite to me as a person &amp; the type of vibe that a child of mine would be raised in. Clarabel I don&#8217;t mind &amp; is sweet, though Clarabelle is better to me (dislike it when the names are spelled Annabel etc, it doesn&#8217;t look &#8216;complete&#8217;). I just don&#8217;t like Clara enough to ever consider it. Daisy I do like, though it had to grow on me. I wouldn&#8217;t use it, though I think it&#8217;s cute.Very British <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Very interesting post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

